Recent Posts

Showing posts with label school. education. teachers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label school. education. teachers. Show all posts

Monday, June 20, 2011

I Feel Like A Fraud

Academic discussion in my school, I have observed, are always rather limited, if there are any. And I think that this limitation which is supposed to foster academic camaraderie and critical thinking is the reason why my school is gasping for air of excellence. This is the reason for my school's culture of mediocrity. I have always felt gagged in this school, living always with the fear that somebody from my classes will tell my ideas to other teachers. I always have to watch my mouth because I might say things that other people, being numbed by conservatism, might find wrong. I cannot even say, "fat" anymore without a colleague making it a big deal. I also think that this is the reason why I can't write decently anymore. I've been suppressing my beliefs at the expense of my way of thinking. I've been denying myself my beliefs for a mere $300 a month.

It's hard to f***** shut up, you know.
My students have always viewed me as their most free-minded teacher and they want it that way. But you see, we are in a conservative institution, so I need to dilute the things that I say to them to cover up. And I feel like a fraud. I am covering up things that I believe will show to my students the other side of the coin to the things that they believed, or things that they were lead to believe, all their lives. I want to show them that the world is so rich that they need not to only see one of its facets, but they need and would always want to see its entirety. I went in their glass-stained cage voluntarily, hoping that I will shatter that cage. In a way, I have been a little successful; my "diluted" opinions were became cracks in the mirror. I want to give more, but I am as much as inside the cage as they are.

Friday, June 17, 2011

The Shackles Of Our Mind

Written while attending a boring seminar.


I have always believed that this institution, instead of cultivating a culture of excellence, is actually propagating a culture of mediocrity.



This started with a statement from one of my colleagues. She was recalling her experiences to me as a newbie teacher in our school. She was one of the stars of her batch. She was usually given tasks such as conducting basic grammar lectures to the faculty, writing scripts for emcees, to being an emcee herself.  It was also during this time when another of her colleagues told her not to bring too much attention to herself because other members of the faculty might always tell her to do her usual extra work. Why? Aside from the fact that these extra work is unpaid, people will always be dependent on her, asking her to do favors, so in the process, becomes a hindrance to what her real job is, teaching. This is the reason why only a few teachers in our department want to show their talents.

This, I think, should not be the case. Yes, the school gives the faculty opportunities, but not everybody wants it. It's because even if they depend on these talented people, deep down, they resent that quality, they resent the achievement that the person has, and that they are just waiting for that person to make the tiniest of mistakes so they can ravish that person together. Bringing him or her down. Suddenly, being talented is a sin here. So the person, not wanting to incur the sneers of her colleagues, clam up.

You don't see me. XD

We are always told to deliver, but we are not given the supportive environment for us to really grow. Our colleagues would depend on us, but we would always have this feeling that they will be the first ones who will step on us the moment we slip.

It is rather stunting. The negative energy of the academic community stifles the growth of the teachers. And it is hypocritical of ourselves to force our students to be the best when we ourselves stunt each other's talents and scoff.

This is sad. I believe that a school will never be a cradle of critical thinking and excellence if the teachers themselves are not allowed to explore and celebrate their beliefs and ideas.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

From the Old Notebook: K - 12 Education


Like what the title says, this essay was written two years ago during the hoopla that was the K-12 education. Apparently, the issue became a bigger hoopla because the curriculum will now be implemented this school year.


Who is tired of studying for fourteen or more straight years? I am. I am because I feel that my brain is so ready to explode right after I throw myself out of college. As for my parents, I can feel their tired sigh as I will finally stop draining their wallets.

You have to admit it, education is one wallet killer.

Formal schooling is a very long and rigid process of educating oneself, and I can actually measure that it is indeed very long, since I grew up studying and living in one place, my dear dear city. I saw the neighbors’ children grow up, I saw changes in the houses, and I saw my neighborhood grow in terms of population, as the said neighbors kept on sharing the night with their spouses. Bottomline? I am growing up, everybody’s growing up, and I am still studying. Some of my contemporaries stopped schooling altogether, and CHOSE to be an out-of-school youth. Their reason? Aside from the obvious, which is that they don't have money, the other reason is the length. Is ten years of Basic Ed that long? They didn’t even try to finish secondary school. I was thinking that maybe they were including college in the count which strengthened the discouragement and disinterest among them and their parents. Elementary and high school is already too long, we can’t bear college anymore, they say, they think that the time spent in school should be spent for working and not for studying. This inclusion of college in the count reflects the mentality that if a person didn’t finish college, then that person will never be able to get a professional job, pushing that person to pursue blue-collared jobs or to be part of the informal sector of the workforce. This is exactly what happened to my contemporaries, they stopped schooling, and are now working. This situation, for me, is not a bad thing, as a person does not need a degree to be a worker, he or she only needs skills appropriate to the job, or he or she can establish a business where he or she will have the income needed. There’s no need to be a summa cum laude to be a gazillionaire.


This is f***in sad.

And here is DepEd trying to push for a twelve year basic education program which they think will further the skills and knowledge of the youth, as they believe that Filipinos are already lagging behind other countries in terms of “global competitiveness”. Parents both from private and public schools were enraged by this proposal, as they will have to shell out bigger amounts of money, and in case of the public school folks, they will have to survive another two years of trying to make ends meet. We can’t blame the parents, they think that basic education is already expensive, and they still have college to think of. But hey, let the children find a way to get through college if the family does not have enough or has no money for college education. Don’t babysit a sixteen year old too much.


Christ Jesus. I wouldn't even consider having a child if he looks like him.

Well, I agree to DepEd to the extent that we are lagging behind everybody in terms of economic competitiveness and the respect received from other nationalities. But since the thrust of our government is to make workers and not entrepreneurs out of my countrymen, then I am totally for the two year extension of the basic education, provided that the curriculum will give the students enough skills to land a job or to make jobs (establish a business) even if they only have a high school diploma. An example of which is basic bookkeeping or hands-on training in the different professions, then if they find something interesting while studying, they can decide to further their studies through attending college, or applying what they have learned right after high school. The point here is that students will be ensured that they will have success even just after high school, and that the decision to pursue college education will be on their hands and not on their parents’ mouths.

This, I think, will be a very difficult undertaking, as what I am thinking will wreck the nerves of my country's attitude towards high school graduates and the college diploma. They value education, I know and am proud of that, but we put too much prestige to the college diploma, to the extent that it is already ridiculous, as we scoff at high school graduates, who are, by the way, also educated, and we can’t seem to deviate from the finish-college-and-get-a-job attitude. This attitude will be the major hindrance to the basic education’s extension’s fruition apart from the budget, political, and social will needed for the changes.
Having a job is not the sole source of income, there are millions of other pursuits that can make us get that dream car, dream house, and dream life. I am telling you this: economically speaking, the completion of both basic and tertiary education is not the sole ticket to success.

I am not saying that we must all dropout from high school or college. We are all unique individuals, and if our formula for success is finishing just high school or both high school and college, then I don’t have any issue, as our triumphs will depend on our choices. What was given here is a vision for the educational system, and probably even for our society.

Sunday, June 5, 2011

The Highest and Lowest Points in Teaching


This essay was submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements in one of my education courses back in college. I felt a need of documenting how my beliefs are changing. And ideologically, I am going strong. Still, it's nice to look at my essays during these times. It feels so naive yet idealistic at the same time.

Some teachers say that they find joy in teaching. Honestly, I believe them in a sense. There is always a sense of fulfillment whenever students learn. Yes, I feel that temporarily, but just to be true to myself, I didn’t have a highest moment in student teaching though I have a lowest.

Teaching is a noble profession?

Call me insensitive, I don’t care. I think that being happy about the performance of the students is something that should be reflected about. Why are we happy with it? Is it because the lesson plan went exactly as we want it to be? Is it because the students are behaved? These are, indeed, factors to be considered, but we should think that when the lesson plan is followed and ALL of the students behaved exactly as we wanted them to be, then we have a problem. The problem is that we make them conform, and conformity is against my very philosophy that I must respect my students’ individual differences. I made them all follow me and I turned them into unthinking robots for a period. Do this, do that. Therefore, I didn’t made them think freely, I didn’t make them make their own meaning. I am just happy with my teaching whenever I sense that they grasped the lesson in different ways. I don’t want to get a high moment from teaching, because I didn’t take Education to make hordes of students make me happy. I teach you; make me happy. That I think is not a good attitude. Teaching did not dawn to humanity to inflate teachers’ egos.


But I'm sure as hell don't want to look too stressed about it...

I also didn’t have a lowest moment in teaching itself, because this would truly affect the atmosphere inside the classroom. I don’t want to enter the classroom depressed and in turn, depressing my students. But I did have a lowest moment in my relationship with the other teachers in school. I like my opinions being questioned, but I don’t like my ideas being blocked, especially if the topic that I’m talking about would surely affect the students like RH Bill. One teacher did it, and I was seething in disguised annoyance. This is only one of the many examples in which schools sometimes kill the positive energy that young teachers bring. If we are so serious in educating our students and making them think, then the school must be an institution of the exchange of ideas not just between students but also between the teachers themselves. The teachers must be the ones who must start a healthy intellectual discourse about pressing issues that will surely have its effect in education. This brings me to my philosophy that teachers themselves must be free to think. If teachers smother each other to prevent them from thinking, then they would do the same to the students. They would just stunt the minds of the students and turn them into a mindless horde.

Some teachers say that they find joy in teaching. Yes, I believe them, as there is always a sense of fulfillment whenever students learn. I am yet to have that highest moment, but I’m not bracing myself, because these same teachers didn’t tell us if schools are havens for thinking, anyway. 

Friday, June 3, 2011

Shut Up, Teacher

A little essay I wrote out of frustration. I forgot about this essay until I found it in my computer's many many folders. Wrote it way back when I was doing my practicum. And looking at myself from two years ago, I realized that being in a conservative school has never diminished my beliefs.



It was a sunny late morning and the heat of the incoming summer was starting to be felt in our faculty room.
Flux of graduating students also went in and out of the room, as it was a deadline day. At my table, I was reading an article from a newspaper about the reproductive health bill and since majority of the teachers that were with me in that room were married and had have kids, I asked them if they were in favor of the bill. The teachers gave me an assertive answer, as they felt that there was nothing wrong with it and they were not killing anybody in using contraceptives. A teacher also asked me if I was for it, I said yes, and I also said my criticism on the church’s stand. However, another teacher whispered to me which dragged me away from the friendly sharing of opinions, “Do not engage in debate yet, you're still a student-teacher.” As she was saying this, the topic was still being discussed, and the said teacher asked me my motives. I said that I just felt agitated with the church’s logic. She nodded her head and turned her attention back to what she was doing.

As soon as I found a way to go back to the conversation, I looked closely at the highlighter marker pen that I was holding and said, “This highlighter's cool; it looks like a lipbalm.” I felt a sense of success as one of the teachers who answered me took my highlighter and examined it; they really welcomed the change of topic. They ate my bait.

As I went back to reading the article, I wondered on why student teachers are not allowed to give their views on pressing issues. Sure, I am young and I still do not understand a real public school teacher’s reality. But the issue at hand must surely be a part of a real school teacher’s reality, as the topic that I opened concerned not only the parents, but most especially the students, their students. I heard their god-knows-how-many conversations about their students getting pregnant at age 16 and younger, so why prevent a healthy discourse about a soon-to be policy that would have an effect in the educational curriculum? Should we as teachers be aware of these things? Should we stop ourselves in participating or even initiating a potentially intellectually fruitful conversation? I heeded the teacher’s call for me to stop babbling about the topic; I saw her point that I was not in the position to open the topic up, but I am sure that I am in the position to open up the topic as a concerned youth concerned with her fellow youth. It seemed to me that she was trying to impose the don’t-talk-because-you-are-the-state’s-robot type of silence on me. But how about her? She is in the exact position to participate in discussions, as the double-edged sword of being a citizen and teacher is on her shoulders. She is a full-pledged teacher; can she do what I can do? She is young; can she be as concerned? The school cannot be considered as an institution in a vacuum, and teachers cannot stay apolitical for so long just because the government is putting money in their pockets. We are political beings whether we like it or not, and it is our choice to be either become a catalyst of change or a perpetuator of state oppression.

How can we change our students if we keep silent? How can we contribute in making a better society for our students if we ourselves refuse to put into question the issues that will deeply affect them?

I went to the lavatory and saw the much senior teacher who took my highlighter. I asked her.

"Ma'am, is it just fine if we student-teachers initiate topics like RH bill earlier?"

"It's just fine. It's just fine for a teacher to air her views. What's forbidden for a teacher is to endorse a politician."

Two conflicting views indeed.

The teacher went out of the comfort room to go to her class, and I continued washing my hands. I remembered my reason for staying in education, “to make myself a liberal working in an overly conservative working environment.”

I stared at myself in the mirror with anger bubbling up my chest.

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Administrators are Prudish People

With all the hoopla that was UbD, I was most enlightened by the seminar my school had days ago. It made me realize that UbD is actually very simple, lesson planning-wise and execution-wise. But apparently, its the administrators who are pulling us down. 

Pulling us into the pits of academic insanity.

We teachers (who have been cheated so many times already), agreed to the speaker when she said that UbD is supposed to be simpler. We filled our auditorium with the sound of our agreement and relief. 

We're close to hysterics, actually. *sigh*

But you know, administrators took it as a voice of dissent. Well, yes, it was a voice of dissent not only of probationary teachers but also of our more seasoned teachers. So, it didn't come as a surprise when our area head (and I love her) told us that the higher-ups of the institution took offense. And I say, they really should take offense and responsibility, because if we didn't have that seminar, then we wouldn't know that we are bullshitting ourselves, and that it could have been easier if they invited the freaking speaker earlier last year.


BOOOOOOOOOOO!
That seminar caused confusion. Are we going to push on with our plans? Are we going to use the plans from last year? But the topics for this year are different! Are we going to edit it? But I'm through! And the list goes on. 

These administrators shouldn't take offense if we teachers are airing their discontent, it shows their incompetence all the more. This confusion was their fault in the first place. If they have that seminar earlier on, then we wouldn't write trash lesson plans all in the name of compliance. They told us to submit our plans in the middle of the month, and then suddenly they will invite a speaker who would point out our mistakes and then they would tell us to rewrite our lesson plans? Fuck them all. Let them write the plans themselves. And it doesn't help that they gave us a more complicated template. 

We're not sado-masochists, people. So why make it so complicated?

What these administrators do not realize is that, at the end of the day, it is the teachers who would bear the burden of it all. If you go inside a classroom with a faulty plan, then you'll have a faulty class, observation, class performance, grades, and faulty national achievement test results. And when you have these faulty things, of course, they put the blame on the teachers who are just basically following directives from the higher-ups (who fucked up the whole thing in the first place). 

So, these administrators do not have the right to bitch about us bitching about how we hate the current situation. They run a private school and they have the f*****g power to adjust the FAPE format or reject the format altogether just because they can and it can be more beneficial to the teachers. But hell no, they made us do it without realizing that it is not what the proponents of UbD envisioned. And now that they are garnering the teachers' wrath, they get back to us? That's the problem with following uncritically. Shows their level of incompetence actually.

As for the lesson plans itself, it has been decided that whatever we have finished  will be left as it is and that the proper format (of EU and EQ) must already be followed in the two final quarters. But what I am bitter about is that these administrators stuck with the FAPE format. I mean, I consider that format to be a format of some humbug trying to be more significant than the proponents themselves. Why can't they accept that that format is so f****** wrong? Oh well, they don't want to admit that they're wrong so, might as well stick with it, yeah? Christ Jesus.

Teaching is good, innovation is good, and change is good, but if you are doing it the wrong way, might as well don't do it at all.

Monday, May 30, 2011

I Am Understanding by Design

This year, our school is going to embark on a journey called "UbD" or Understanding by Design. This thing has been around in a while in America, but here in my country, it was implemented last year in the public schools. But since I am in a private school, it is only now that we are catching up with this UbD fever.


I already heard this UbD when I was still a practicumer in college 2 years ago, and I always thought that it is a sort of planning the lesson but you think of the assessment first. Well, to be frank, I always thought that it's only a different way of writing lesson plans.

I'm as skeptical as skeptical goes.

So here is my school catching up the fever because the Department of Education directed that the schools follow this UbD way of thinking. But it comes with a price, you see. We the members of the faculty feel very cheated of our vacation because we need to spend it doing the UbD templates. And it is such a pain on the ass considering that we need to prepare those lesson plans and we need to implement it already this coming school year. I have always thought that curriculum planning takes years, and lesson planning takes time. But making the teachers rush their lesson plans for compliance is doing the teachers (and students) injustice. If the plan is faulty, then I'm very sure that the execution would also be faulty since the teacher doesn't know what the hell she is doing. And in the long run, the students would just become guinea pigs. Basically, we are doing the lesson plans in the dark. We are just hoping that even if the plan sucks, we would be able to pull off the execution right.

My students and I are all guinea pigs.
Yes, there have been seminars, but most of it didn't really help us at all. If it did, it only caused confusion and resentment among the faculty and the administration. We have this certain seminar in the school a couple of days ago, and we invited a speaker from a publishing house to help us tresh out this confusion. Turns out, this speaker have also attended UbD seminars in America with no less than the proponents of UbD themselves. And it was most enlightening, not only did we see the things that we are doing wrong (thanks to the lesson plan critiquing), but it also made us realize that crafting UbD templates and executing it is really just simple. And that simplicity made all the difference.

According to her, all lesson are done with A-Acquisition, M-Meaning-making and T-Transfer. Now, what puzzles me is that if I am going to look at a sample UbD learning guide, it only consists of the days and the things that you are going to do in those days.

Example:

Nutrition (Grade 6) Duration: 2 weeks

Day 1: Begin with an entry question (Can the foods you eat cause pimples?) to hook students into considering the effects of nutrition in their lives. (Making meaning)
Introduce key vocabulary terms and discuss relevant selections from the textbook. (Acquisition)

Day 2: Quiz on key vocabulary terms and selections from the book
Day 3: Students work independently to develop a three-day camp menu for younger children and offer them ideas for breaking bad eating habits


And so on and so forth. The speaker told us that that is the original UbD template. And we were like, "What the f**k?" because what we are doing with our templates is, if we are going to follow this thing strictly, wrong. What we did with our templates is this.

I.    Introduction
II.    Interaction
III.    Integration
IV.    Closure
V. Agreement

And I was like...are we a bunch of sado-masochists here? So I figured this was the f***ing reason why we are having a very hard time devicing our learning plans. We are deliberately making our lives harder. It got me thinking, where in the world did our administrators get their template? They said that it was from FAPE (Fund for Assistance to Private Education), and the speaker admitted that the FAPE template is actually more complicated than the original UbD template. I felt cheated. If we have an easier template, why did they opt to choose the more complicated route? One of my colleagues said that the FAPE template is designed for Catholic schools, but what makes the template so Catholic? What makes it more effective than the original? So we felt all the more cheated by our administrators, why is it that they only scheduled the seminar now? Why only now that some of us (myself included) are already through with our learning plans? They have the whole freaking school year last year to invite that speaker. And now, they only caused confusion among us, and resentment towards our admins.

We're this close to confronting the higher - ups.
 Like our speaker said, "UbD entails us enjoying life, simplifying life," but in my school, it is surely not the case.

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Vacation? What Vacation? Is that food?

I have been logging in and out of Facebook lately, and I could say that the students are already damn bored of their vacation that they are so ready to go back to school.



This, for me, made me realize that the school year is about to start and I still haven't got the hang of my so-called "vacation." I mean, I'm still fed up going to school because of paper work and that so wrong advanced English classes. It didn't help at all. The students are refreshed, but I'm still stressed and fed up. Go figure. It also doesn't help that we will report to work starting the 16th. My problem is that those three weeks before classes should be spent writing and refining our lesson plans and not warming the chairs in our auditorium listening to some "expert" blabbering about what we should do inside our classrooms.

Come June and the students are refreshed, eager to learn, but I am still pissed off.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Advanced English Classes Blues

I have been ranting about my Advanced English classes two weeks ago, and thank God it's already through. I just do not like the idea of waking up during vacation when you are supposed to be sleeping in only to go to work. The pay, as I told you before, is far from appeasing me, actually, it rather adds up to my rage. However, the only consolation that I have is that I have brilliant students who really wanted to learn and develop their speaking skills.


Yep, I want them to talk sensibly. I want them to wow people every time they speak
This advanced English classes is, well, supposed to hone the whatever skills the students already have. These students already mastered the language forms in the classroom, so I decided to focus more on sharpening their speaking and listening skills.

Teaching these students is a whiff of fresh air. They are indeed very, very different from my unruly, crass, and unmotivated students from the past school year. They made me feel that I was doing something right, and that my efforts for them are not laid to waste. I listened to their monotone poetry reading turning into something more promising, I watched their anxiety as they delivered their speeches in front of the incoming Junior students, and I felt elated with their sadness when I told them that we can't have debate anymore because of time-constraints.

It was a challenge teaching them, yet, it was at the same time very fulfilling. And in a way, they made me become aware of the things that I do and don't do as a teacher. I realized that I am not at all the steel-tough teacher that my school wants me to be; I have always felt that I always wanted to reach out to my students, to be relevant to them, thus making a more harmonious classroom. It doesn't matter to me if they would consider the subject as easy, because, for me, it's actually the purpose of learning (and English is actually easy), that you are doing impossible feats in a certain aspect that you don't notice it anymore.

But still, all good things need to end. And come June, another set of unruly, crass, and unmotivated students will come my way.

I think I will miss this summer.

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Repost : A Mental Asylum That Is The School

A repost of an essay which I read from eons ago. I want to thank Elizabeth Lim for letting me.

As in every ordinary day in the lives of students, I, a student myself, have to endure the routinary going and going to schools, of attending to classes, of reciting memorized facts and unloading it on the test paper, of pleasing our professors, of pretended listening to them and to our classmates who report on it.



But did we really ask for this arrangement? Did we really ask for us to be educated in the first place? We always say that we wanted to study, so we will have a better future blah, blah, blah, but is this really what we want? If yes, why then are we always dragging ourselves to attend our classes? In rainy days, why do we always choose to sleep in, and not hurry because we will already be late for the first period? I certainly don’t know the answer of course. But we always said that we wanted to study because we wanted to be better individuals. Many parents have said that education is their only legacy to their children, that is why at our very young age, we, the children go to school in an effort to fulfill our parents’ wishes, which, inevitably and unconsciously, we will imbibe as our own conviction. This is the very reason why we work our butts of for fourteen to sixteen or more years: we are not studying for ourselves; we are studying (and eventually we will work) only to fulfill somebody’s dream.



As in every ordinary student, we fulfill our professors’ wishes disguised as academic requirements. We endure attending classes all in the name of fulfilling the 10% requirement for attendance even though we already know what will happen: the same professor babbling the exact thing written on the subject’s reference book, the exact same slides which were used for god knows how many semesters already, the exact same classmates not listening to the babbling and who are having their own mini-conferences, reading a manga or texting, or simply staring by the window at the swinging palm trees and the neighboring building.



The students are bored, the teacher is bored, and so what do we students get? Nothing. We endure memorizing facts only to be unloaded in our tests papers indifferent to the value of the facts itself (whether or not it can be a million peso question in some TV quiz show). Yes, we know that we belong to the species homo, the Philippines is near the equator and will always be, but we really don’t care. Besides, we can’t really use those facts right? What is its significance when we will work abroad as engineers, or nurses, or mechanics, or domestic workers right? We memorize that the age of fishes is the Devonian period and we are in the Cenozoic era and the Piltdown man is a hoax. We memorize and memorize and memorize. Write the correct answer on the blanks provided. Pass your papers. Get out of the testing room, and pray that you will get enough points to pass the exam.



We endure submitting papers which were made supposedly for us to contribute to the banks of knowledge and sharpen our grasp of a certain topic, we write about a paper on nationalism, of ultranationalism, a reaction or a discourse analysis of a modern adaptation of “As You Like It”, a reflection about Corazon Aquino’s death and its implications on Philippine politics, and a case study about the English speaking skills of a Korean. We tap on our laptops, desktops, or make our fingers bleed in writing drafts to be later typed on a desktop computer at an internet shop. We do those papers, yes, even in the ungodly hours of the night, midnight, and early morning. Click File, Press Print, OK. The clerk manning the internet shop will snatch the print-out and hand it to you and you the most obedient student will hold it as carefully as you can, and check for any errors, crumples or misprints. Oh, you find a misprint, and you say to the clerk, “Uhh, can you reprint it? The whole text is misaligned.” You see the clerk frown and turn to the computer, and reprint your whole 11 pages paper to be submitted right now. We then run to our classroom to hand it over to our professor. Or if our professor suddenly decided to postpone the class, or if he did a no show, we will just have to slid it under the professor’s room, tack it on their office’s door or put it on their pigeon hole of their department.



We also endure that thing called reporting. I admit, sometimes its good, but most of the time it is not. Just imagine yourself listening to another student who was assigned to report, say, Perennialism and Essentialism, you already read the reference book, and you liked the theory of those two, but suddenly, your classmate seemed to just read everything from the book when he presented it. You walk out of the classroom feeling dejected, and feeling that you shouldn’t have attended the class at all. There are also times when we report on something, and the professor suddenly barks that you are wrong. Then if it is wrong, the professor shouldn’t have required reporting in the first place when he doesn’t trust his students anyway. It is ironic to think that we entered the university to study and to learn from these enlightened people, but then what happens is that we endure listening to our classmates who are also groping in the dark about their assigned topic. Pity them for no one will help them (only the very unreliable internet), and pity those who listen to them for they will get nothing. It seemed that the professors, enlightened they may be, are not really experts in imparting that knowledge, because what happens in the classroom when they “teach” is that the students are fed with too much technical terms and jargon: syntax, subject position, phenomenology, objective correlative, chemiosmosis blah blah blah that the students get out of the classroom feeling dizzy. As a remedy, these enlightened professors do not simplify their words, worse, they make the students do their work. Thanks to them, reporting became the sole teaching technique in most subjects in the university.



Who is to blame for all this boredom? Well, that is like asking the chicken and egg question. Of course the professors will blame the students, and the students the professors, but thinking about it, it is not so much about the students being lazy butts. On the contrary, we students are not, because if we are, then we wouldn’t really waste our precious time in fulfilling academic requirements, worse, we could just have dropped out of college. This boredom of the students comes from the repetition of everything that they already know by instinct. They already know that a professor will teach them, they already know that the said professor will give them requirements, and they already know that they will have to do everything that a student needs to do like listening and sitting for one and a half hour without speaking, passively accepting every information and every word from their professor. Why? Well, we students have been sitting and standing and listening for a good fourteen or so years of our lives. In preschool we were taught to behave, to sit properly to be labeled a “good boy” or “good girl” and to be given a star at the end of each class. In grade school, we are taught to respect our teachers and to do what they say we do like dusting the eraser, or buying the teacher her merienda during recess. In high school, we have our all rebelling hormones that tell us to do the very thing our teachers don’t want us to do like smoking or petting in CRs or bringing mobile phones, or simply not wearing our uniform properly. But in the end, we are harassed by school officials, saying that we must not do those, lest they will give us low grades in Values Education. We are taught not to think, not to question, and just please everybody, so we will be labeled a good boy or good girl. If we question, if we defy, if we talked back and reason, we will be labeled “bad” students, and be sent to the guidance counselor.



And then college, all of those restrictions that kept the teenager from pursuing what he or she really wants during the earlier years of schooling were tossed to the pits of history, no more uniforms, no more teachers telling you that cellphones are not allowed, no more preaching teachers, and most importantly the teenager can now be free to reason and to think. However, boredom came in, and the poor teenager’s passion was doused with water, with apathy, not caring anymore if he or she passes. She just continues with her life, waking up and preparing herself to school, entering the classroom and listens to the professor and if it happened that it is her turn to report, she will just read from the powerpoint presentation that she prepared, and go on to the next class, and repeat almost everything that she did in her previous class. All of this we have to do for four to five years in college. Why did it become like this? Well, maybe we became too obedient when we were in grade school and high school that we became very passive students, and we will just yawn and heavily lift our butts from our seats if ever we encounter a professor who wanted to stoke the fire of energy in us.



Then we will suddenly realize that we are out of college; that we are already in the adult world, and no thanks to the education that we received for fourteen years or so, we basically still don’t know what to do. Even though we already have that piece of paper called diploma, we would still end up following the whims of somebody: this time, our boss, our manager, our supervisor, our principal, and Ma’am and Sir. We will still end up in crutches, and it is because we were controlled too much in school, and unknowingly, we followed too much.


The education we received, therefore, is not education, but a control that made us dependent on other people; that made us like servants waiting for a master to tell us what to do. The schools are not producing better individuals therefore, it only produced stringed dolls that can’t think and are blind, and ever wary of the perpetual gaze of the panopticon.

Monday, April 18, 2011

School Sucks!

It is so uncool from stopping teachers to be cool.


For the longest time ever, there haven't been any model for a modern teacher. Whenever we hear the word "teacher", what we see is the figure of a spinster with her hair in a bun, wearing half-moon spectacles, and that smug and uppity posture that surely irritates me.

No wonder students viewed teachers and the time spent on school as S-even C-rappy H-ours O-f O-ur L-ives. S.C.H.O.O.L.


Don't worry, kids, the feeling is mutual.

Who wants to spend time standing in front of 50+ students who are not listening to you?
Who wants to spend time checking test papers?
Who wants to spend time crafting lesson plans?
Who wants to spend time dealing with parents who do care about grades but do not care about how much their child has learned and then shout at the teacher?
Who wants to spend time dealing with the principal?
Who wants to spend their entire f****** lifetime thinking of other people? In this case, kids?

Unfortunately, that's my job.

You see, kids, I want you to imagine that 8 hours we spend on teaching.  I could have written a book or read a whole book with that time, f***, I could have even taught my own brother!
So, do not go on strutting your asses on our noses telling us that school sucks, because well, you don't need to tell us that, because you see, you came in school and suddenly school sucked.

But what I hate so much is stopping us from rocking the roll...

I have a colleague, who with other colleagues, have been asked to perform in front of the students. Sure, that colleague of mine rocked the house singing in the tune of songs the kids adored. But to our dismay, days after the performance, one of our older colleagues said that yes, some might have appreciated his performance, but some might not. And you see, there is no particular reason for that depreciation.

Were they scandalized? It's not like my colleague did a strip show.

Are they worried that the reputation of my colleague might have gotten down? I don't think so, kids are always proud of a teacher who literally rocks their world.

It's the stuff of their wet dreams, actually.

If these other colleagues of ours are so bent on protecting our reputation, it's actually surprising that they hired us in the first place. No. Scratch that. If they are so bent on protecting the kids from teachers who rock, it's actually surprising that they built a school in the first place.

*sigh*

Stopping the teachers from being cool is so uncool. Remember that.