Brought a 2010 almanac and found this section about the "Most Challenged Books". Listed there are the titles of the books and the reasons why they were challenged. And the reasons were homosexuality, violence, religious viewpoints and political viewpoints. Well, fuck, I downloaded and read one or two of them without batting an eyelash.
Point is, if you challenge a book, you are actually luring readers to read the whole fucking thing which you don't want to happen in the first place.
So far, it has been an interesting read, and so far I am not offended at all. So what if American teenagers are having sex while in high school? Don't we know that universally? So what if these teeners are gay and are banging on each other while on drugs? It's not like they won't do it anymore once they have their own families. It's more like, you know, they do fuck each other while on drugs for practice.
Why aren't these moral freaks reacting to the sex, drugs and all the yummy things that are in TV and now in our youth's minds? Talk about consistency again, people.
And mind you, I haven't even read everything, yet. And that's telling something.
Point is, if you challenge a book, you are actually luring readers to read the whole fucking thing which you don't want to happen in the first place.
So far, it has been an interesting read, and so far I am not offended at all. So what if American teenagers are having sex while in high school? Don't we know that universally? So what if these teeners are gay and are banging on each other while on drugs? It's not like they won't do it anymore once they have their own families. It's more like, you know, they do fuck each other while on drugs for practice.
Why aren't these moral freaks reacting to the sex, drugs and all the yummy things that are in TV and now in our youth's minds? Talk about consistency again, people.
And mind you, I haven't even read everything, yet. And that's telling something.
0 comments:
Post a Comment